The new North-west

Where this standsEn qué punto está

The full text of this article is still being prepared. Until it is ready, this page carries a summary, the passage found on the page, and the link to the original, which is always one click away.El texto completo de este artículo aún se está preparando. Hasta que esté listo, esta página lleva un resumen, el pasaje encontrado en la página y el enlace al original, que siempre está a un clic.

From the original pageDe la página original

The passage where this article was found, copied from the newspaper page itself, reading errors and all. This is exactly what the summary above is based on.El pasaje donde se encontró este artículo, copiado de la propia página del periódico, con sus errores de lectura y todo. Esto es exactamente aquello en lo que se basa el resumen de arriba.

characterized as ridiculously untrue. The

President never had the treaty papers in,

his possession. They were in the hands of

the Secretary of State. The facts were

these: The President in conversation with

Mr, Sumner laid before that gentleman the

features of the treaty. This information

was imparted orally; no written or printed

document was read to the Senator. Mr.

Sumner made no opposition to any of its

features. Indeed, so warmly did he ex

press his approval of it that a gentleman

present at the interview, who prior to that

time had placed himself in opposition to

the measure, was made friendly to it solely

be the arguments used by Mr. Sumner.

Mr. Fish said that Mr. Sumner continued

to favor the treaty until the selection of a

commissioner to St. Domingo came up for

settlement, and when he found that J. M.

Ashley, of Ohio, was not to be the nominee

he then all at once lost interest in the

treaty, until finally he placed himself in di

rect opposition to it.

CONVBESATION BETWEEN GRANT AND SUM

NER.

The conversation between President

Grant and Mr. Sumner took place toward

the last of December, 1869, or the

first of January following, and in Februa

ary, Mr. Fish said, two Senators, Carl

Schurz and Mr. Stewart, of Nevada, gen

tlemen of opposite lolitical views, canvass

ed the Senate and found the treaty could

not pass that body; that it was dead. Mr.

Sumner was not removed from the Foreign

Affairs Committee at the reassembling

t in the fall, but upon the meeting of the

L new Congress in 1871 he was not -reap

pointed. His term had expired; he was

How to cite this articleCómo citar este artículo

The new North-west. (1877). Deer Lodge, Mont., 1877-11-09. US/DR Newspaper Timeline. Library of Congress, Chronicling America: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84038125/1877-11-09/ed-1/?sp=4

ReferencesReferencias

Library of Congress, Chronicling America: The new North-west, 1877-11-09.