1820–1984 · Library of CongressBiblioteca del Congreso · Chronicling America

US/DR Newspaper Timeline

The Dominican Republic in the American Press: United States newspaper coverage of the island, gathered and translated for readers in both languagesLa República Dominicana en la prensa estadounidense: la cobertura de la isla en los periódicos de Estados Unidos, reunida y traducida para lectores en ambos idiomas
August 23, 188523 de agosto de 1885 · Indianapolis [Ind.] · Grant Annexation Debates & Bondholder PoliticsDebates de Anexión de Grant y Política de Bonistas

The Indianapolis journal

SourceFuente: The Indianapolis journal · Indianapolis [Ind.] · August 23, 188523 de agosto de 1885
https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn82015679/1885-08-23/ed-1/?sp=9

In contextEn contexto

Grant Annexation Debates & Bondholder PoliticsDebates de Anexión de Grant y Política de Bonistas · 1865–1905

President Ulysses S. Grant championed a treaty to annex Santo Domingo (1869–1870), sparking a historic Senate battle led by Charles Sumner. Later coverage tracked President Ulises Heureaux (Lilís) and crushing European bond debt.El presidente Ulysses S. Grant promovió un tratado para anexar Santo Domingo (1869–1870), provocando una histórica batalla en el Senado con Charles Sumner. Informes posteriores siguieron al presidente Ulises Heureaux (Lilís) y la deuda externa.

← Earlier articleArtículo anterior: Belmont chronicle · July 30, 188530 de julio de 1885Later articleArtículo siguiente: The Indiana State sentinel · September 2, 18852 de septiembre de 1885 →

More on The Annexation DebateMás sobre El debate de la anexión

SummaryResumen

Ben Perley Poore recounts how the ill feeling between President Grant and Senator Sumner grew out of a misunderstanding on the evening the San Domingo treaty was sent to the Senate: Sumner thought Grant wanted his help defending General Babcock's expenditures in Santo Domingo, while Grant meant the treaty for acquiring the Dominican Republic. When Babcock read the treaty to Sumner the next day, Sumner objected to the stipulation that Grant would use his influence to make annexation popular in Congress, and became the enemy of the whole scheme.

Ben Perley Poore relata cómo el resentimiento entre el presidente Grant y el senador Sumner nació de un malentendido la noche en que el tratado de Santo Domingo fue enviado al Senado: Sumner creyó que Grant quería su ayuda para defender los gastos del general Babcock en Santo Domingo, mientras que Grant se refería al tratado para adquirir la República Dominicana. Cuando Babcock le leyó el tratado a Sumner al día siguiente, Sumner objetó la estipulación de que Grant usaría su influencia para hacer popular la anexión en el Congreso, y se convirtió en enemigo de todo el proyecto.

Where this standsEn qué punto está

The full text of this article is still being prepared. Until it is ready, this page carries a summary, the passage found on the page, and the link to the original, which is always one click away.El texto completo de este artículo aún se está preparando. Hasta que esté listo, esta página lleva un resumen, el pasaje encontrado en la página y el enlace al original, que siempre está a un clic.

From the original pageDe la página original

The passage where this article was found, copied from the newspaper page itself, reading errors and all. This is exactly what the summary above is based on.El pasaje donde se encontró este artículo, copiado de la propia página del periódico, con sus errores de lectura y todo. Esto es exactamente aquello en lo que se basa el resumen de arriba.

hostility to it to General Babcock iu untnistakea

terms.

That was the time when well meaning friends

of both of these great men might have secured

satisfactory mutual explanation, although no

living power could have made Senator Sumner

a supporter of the acquisition of the port of

Samana, in San Domiugo. In the Senate syco

phants who “carried water on both shoulders*

and men who always delight in fomenting quar

rels embittered Mr. Sumner against tho Presi

dent. One had served his country well in the

camp, while the other had performed equally in

valuable services in the Senate; one was a states

man, the other was a soldier. What did not ap

pear to be wrong to the General tho Senator

regarded as criminal. Conscious of tho value of

his services in saving the Union. General Grant

accepted with gratitude the voluntary offerings

of grateful citizens; hut Senator Sumner, who

had seen too much of political life and of politi

cians knew too well that those who mako gifts to

public men expect favors in return, and that

every public man should be inflexibly opposed

to the reception of presents. Remarks by him

about the President, and remarks by the Presi

dent about him wtre carried to and fro by mis

chiof makers like the shuttle of a loom, and he

found hi rase 1 f placed at the head of a clique of

disappointed Republicans, who were determined

to prevent, if possible, the re election of General

Grant to the Presidency.

Henry Wilson, then Vice president of the

United States, endeavored to restore harmony,

How to cite this articleCómo citar este artículo

The Indianapolis journal. (1885). Indianapolis [Ind.], 1885-08-23. US/DR Newspaper Timeline. Library of Congress, Chronicling America: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn82015679/1885-08-23/ed-1/?sp=9

ReferencesReferencias

Library of Congress, Chronicling America: The Indianapolis journal, 1885-08-23.

Send an observationEnviar una observación

Does this article connect with your family, your town, or something you know? Did we get something wrong? Write to us. Observations go to the editor's inbox and are read by a person.¿Este artículo conecta con su familia, su pueblo o algo que usted conoce? ¿Nos equivocamos en algo? Escríbanos. Las observaciones llegan al buzón del editor y las lee una persona.

Send observationEnviar observación