1820–1984 · Library of CongressBiblioteca del Congreso · Chronicling America

US/DR Newspaper Timeline

The Dominican Republic in the American Press: United States newspaper coverage of the island, gathered and translated for readers in both languagesLa República Dominicana en la prensa estadounidense: la cobertura de la isla en los periódicos de Estados Unidos, reunida y traducida para lectores en ambos idiomas
November 18, 188518 de noviembre de 1885 · Morris, Minn. · Grant Annexation Debates & Bondholder PoliticsDebates de Anexión de Grant y Política de Bonistas

Morris tribune

SourceFuente: Morris tribune · Morris, Minn. · November 18, 188518 de noviembre de 1885
https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn91059394/1885-11-18/ed-1/?sp=4

In contextEn contexto

Grant Annexation Debates & Bondholder PoliticsDebates de Anexión de Grant y Política de Bonistas · 1865–1905

President Ulysses S. Grant championed a treaty to annex Santo Domingo (1869–1870), sparking a historic Senate battle led by Charles Sumner. Later coverage tracked President Ulises Heureaux (Lilís) and crushing European bond debt.El presidente Ulysses S. Grant promovió un tratado para anexar Santo Domingo (1869–1870), provocando una histórica batalla en el Senado con Charles Sumner. Informes posteriores siguieron al presidente Ulises Heureaux (Lilís) y la deuda externa.

← Earlier articleArtículo anterior: The Indiana State sentinel · September 2, 18852 de septiembre de 1885Later articleArtículo siguiente: The New York freeman · November 28, 188528 de noviembre de 1885 →

More on Diplomacy & TreatiesMás sobre Diplomacia y tratados

SummaryResumen

The newspaper reported that Senator Sumner opposed the annexation scheme and the acquisition of the port of Samana in San Domingo because he believed the U.S. President should not act as a lobbyist for it. Furthermore, Senate sycophants and troublemakers worsened relations between Sumner and General Grant by exploiting their differing views on the president acting as a lobbyist and the acceptance of gifts by public men.

El periódico consignó que el senador Sumner combatió la maniobra anexionista y la adquisición de la bahía de Samaná en Santo Domingo al considerar impropio que el jefe de Estado estadounidense obrara como cabildero del proyecto. Por añadidura, intrigantes y aduladores senatoriales profundizaron el distanciamiento entre Sumner y el general Grant explotando sus divergentes criterios sobre las gestiones oficiosas de un mandatario y la aceptación de dádivas por servidores públicos.

Where this standsEn qué punto está

The full text of this article is still being prepared. Until it is ready, this page carries a summary, the passage found on the page, and the link to the original, which is always one click away.El texto completo de este artículo aún se está preparando. Hasta que esté listo, esta página lleva un resumen, el pasaje encontrado en la página y el enlace al original, que siempre está a un clic.

From the original pageDe la página original

The passage where this article was found, copied from the newspaper page itself, reading errors and all. This is exactly what the summary above is based on.El pasaje donde se encontró este artículo, copiado de la propia página del periódico, con sus errores de lectura y todo. Esto es exactamente aquello en lo que se basa el resumen de arriba.

popularity among the members of con

gress as will be necessary for its accom

plishment," Seuator Sumner became

the enemy of the whole scheme. He

did not believe that the president of

the United States should bo made a

lobbyist to bring about annexation by

congress. Some of Mr. Sumner's

friend's used to tell him that he should

have gone at once to Gen. Grant and

have told him that he should oppose

the treaty, aud that he had declared his

hostility to it to Gen. Babcock in un

mistaken terms.

This was the time when well-mean

ing friends of both of ihose great men

might have secure:! satisfactory mutual

explanation, although no living power

could have made Senator Sumner a

supporter of the acquisition of the" port

of Samana iu San Domingo. In the

senate sycophants who "carried water

on both shoulders," and men who al

ways delight in fomenting quarrels,

embittered Mr. Sumner against the

president. Oue had served his country

well in the camp, while tho other had

performed equally invaluable services

in the senate ©no was a statesman,

the other was a soldier. Wrhat did not

appear to be wrong to the general, the

senator regarded as criminal. Con

scious of the value of his services in

saviug the union, Gen. Grant accepted

with gratitude the voluntary offerings of

grateful citizens but Senator Sumner,

who had seen too much of political life

and of politicians, knew too well that

those who make gifts to public men ex

pect favors in return, aud that every

public man should be in llexibiy opposed

to the reception of presents. Remarks

How to cite this articleCómo citar este artículo

Morris tribune. (1885). Morris, Minn., 1885-11-18. US/DR Newspaper Timeline. Library of Congress, Chronicling America: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn91059394/1885-11-18/ed-1/?sp=4

ReferencesReferencias

Library of Congress, Chronicling America: Morris tribune, 1885-11-18.

Send an observationEnviar una observación

Does this article connect with your family, your town, or something you know? Did we get something wrong? Write to us. Observations go to the editor's inbox and are read by a person.¿Este artículo conecta con su familia, su pueblo o algo que usted conoce? ¿Nos equivocamos en algo? Escríbanos. Las observaciones llegan al buzón del editor y las lee una persona.

Send observationEnviar observación