1820–1984 · Library of CongressBiblioteca del Congreso · Chronicling America

US/DR Newspaper Timeline

The Dominican Republic in the American Press: United States newspaper coverage of the island, gathered and translated for readers in both languagesLa República Dominicana en la prensa estadounidense: la cobertura de la isla en los periódicos de Estados Unidos, reunida y traducida para lectores en ambos idiomas
December 9, 18859 de diciembre de 1885 · Saint Paul, Minn. · Grant Annexation Debates & Bondholder PoliticsDebates de Anexión de Grant y Política de Bonistas

St. Paul daily globe

SourceFuente: St. Paul daily globe · Saint Paul, Minn. · December 9, 18859 de diciembre de 1885
https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn90059522/1885-12-09/ed-1/?sp=9

In contextEn contexto

Grant Annexation Debates & Bondholder PoliticsDebates de Anexión de Grant y Política de Bonistas · 1865–1905

President Ulysses S. Grant championed a treaty to annex Santo Domingo (1869–1870), sparking a historic Senate battle led by Charles Sumner. Later coverage tracked President Ulises Heureaux (Lilís) and crushing European bond debt.El presidente Ulysses S. Grant promovió un tratado para anexar Santo Domingo (1869–1870), provocando una histórica batalla en el Senado con Charles Sumner. Informes posteriores siguieron al presidente Ulises Heureaux (Lilís) y la deuda externa.

← Earlier articleArtículo anterior: The New York freeman · November 28, 188528 de noviembre de 1885Later articleArtículo siguiente: The Portland daily press · December 9, 18859 de diciembre de 1885 →

More on Debt & FinanceMás sobre Deuda y finanzas

SummaryResumen

According to the *St. Paul daily globe* of December 9, 1885, a commercial treaty signed with the Dominican Republic was subsequently withdrawn from the Senate for re-examination. The official concluded that entering into such engagements was inexpedient because the treaties required the United States to surrender large revenues on sugar for inadequate advantages, provided only illusory relief to consumers, risked raising embarrassing questions under favored-nation clauses, and diminished independent control over national revenues.

Según el *St. Paul daily globe* del 9 de diciembre de 1885, un tratado comercial suscrito con la República Dominicana fue formalmente retirado del Senado para un nuevo examen. El mandatario concluyó que concertar tales estipulaciones resultaba improcedente, habida cuenta de que exigían a los Estados Unidos resignar cuantiosas rentas arancelarias sobre el azúcar a cambio de ventajas exiguas, brindaban un alivio ilusorio a los consumidores, arriesgaban suscitar enojosas querellas bajo las cláusulas de nación más favorecida y menoscababan el manejo soberano de los ingresos públicos.

Where this standsEn qué punto está

The full text of this article is still being prepared. Until it is ready, this page carries a summary, the passage found on the page, and the link to the original, which is always one click away.El texto completo de este artículo aún se está preparando. Hasta que esté listo, esta página lleva un resumen, el pasaje encontrado en la página y el enlace al original, que siempre está a un clic.

From the original pageDe la página original

The passage where this article was found, copied from the newspaper page itself, reading errors and all. This is exactly what the summary above is based on.El pasaje donde se encontró este artículo, copiado de la propia página del periódico, con sus errores de lectura y todo. Esto es exactamente aquello en lo que se basa el resumen de arriba.

languishing interests in the Antilles, steps

were taken to attain these ends by a treaty of

commerce. A similar treaty was afterward

signed by the Dominican republic. Subse

quently overtures were made by her Britanic

majesty's government for a like mutual ex

tension of commercial intercourse with the

British West India and South American de

pendencies, but without result. On taking

office I withdrew for re-examination the

treaties signed with Spain and Santo Domingo,

then pending before the senate. The result

has been to satisfy me of the Inexpediency

of entering into engagements of this

character not covering tho entire

tariff. These treaties contemplated the sur

render, by the United States, of large rev

enues for inadeauate considerations. Upon

sugar alone duties were surrendered to an

amount far exceeding all the advantages

offered in exchange. Even were it intended

to relieve our consumers, it was evident that,

so long as the exemption but partially cov

ered our importation, such relief would be

illusory. To relinquish a revenue so essen

tial seemed highly improvident at a time

when new and large drains upon the treasury

were contemplated. Moreover, embarrassing

questions would have arisen under the favored

nation clauses of treaties with other nations.

As further objection it is evident that tariff

regulation by treaty diminished that inde

pendent control over its own revenues which

is essential for the safety and welfare of any

government. The emergency calling for an

increase of taxation may at any time arise,

How to cite this articleCómo citar este artículo

St. Paul daily globe. (1885). Saint Paul, Minn., 1885-12-09. US/DR Newspaper Timeline. Library of Congress, Chronicling America: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn90059522/1885-12-09/ed-1/?sp=9

ReferencesReferencias

Library of Congress, Chronicling America: St. Paul daily globe, 1885-12-09.

Send an observationEnviar una observación

Does this article connect with your family, your town, or something you know? Did we get something wrong? Write to us. Observations go to the editor's inbox and are read by a person.¿Este artículo conecta con su familia, su pueblo o algo que usted conoce? ¿Nos equivocamos en algo? Escríbanos. Las observaciones llegan al buzón del editor y las lee una persona.

Send observationEnviar observación