Pine Bluff daily graphic
https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn89051168/1920-09-21/ed-1/?sp=1
In contextEn contexto
President Woodrow Wilson ordered US Marines to occupy the Dominican Republic in May 1916. For eight years, naval governors ruled by martial decree, facing guerrilla resistance ('gavilleros') and Senate investigations.Woodrow Wilson ordenó la ocupación militar en mayo de 1916. Durante ocho años, gobernadores navales gobernaron por decreto marcial, enfrentando resistencia guerrillera ('gavilleros').
More on The Customs ReceivershipMás sobre La receptoría de aduanas
- New-York tribune · September 21, 192021 de septiembre de 1920
- The Ogden standard-examiner · September 21, 192021 de septiembre de 1920
- The Pulaskian · September 23, 192023 de septiembre de 1920
SummaryResumen
The *Pine Bluff daily graphic* reported that Julio M. Cestero of the Dominican junta issued a statement asserting that Dominican citizens never sought U.S. intervention and continually demanded the return of their national sovereignty. In a concurrent release, Secretary of State Colby defended American policy, stating that military intervention in Haiti was prompted by chronic bloodshed and the 1915 lynching of President Guillaume Sam in the French legation. Colby maintained that the United States acted under the Monroe Doctrine to restore order and preempt European military intervention.
El *Pine Bluff daily graphic* informó que Julio M. Cestero, de la junta dominicana, emitió una declaración afirmando que los ciudadanos dominicanos nunca solicitaron la intervención de Estados Unidos y que exigían continuamente la restitución de su soberanía nacional. En un comunicado simultáneo, el secretario de Estado Colby defendió la política estadounidense, señalando que la intervención militar en Haití fue provocada por el derramamiento de sangre crónico y el linchamiento en 1915 del presidente Guillaume Sam en la legación francesa. Colby sostuvo que Estados Unidos actuó en virtud de la Doctrina Monroe para restablecer el orden y prevenir una intervención militar europea.
Where this standsEn qué punto está
The full text of this article is still being prepared. Until it is ready, this page carries a summary, the passage found on the page, and the link to the original, which is always one click away.El texto completo de este artículo aún se está preparando. Hasta que esté listo, esta página lleva un resumen, el pasaje encontrado en la página y el enlace al original, que siempre está a un clic.
From the original pageDe la página original
The passage where this article was found, copied from the newspaper page itself, reading errors and all. This is exactly what the summary above is based on.El pasaje donde se encontró este artículo, copiado de la propia página del periódico, con sus errores de lectura y todo. Esto es exactamente aquello en lo que se basa el resumen de arriba.
island.
Protest against American interven
tion in San Domingo was made in a
simultaneous statement tonight by
Julio M. Cestero. M!. Cestero, repre
senting the Dominican junta in the
United States. Referring to the re
cent declarations by "Senator Harding
and Secretary of the Navy Daniels.
Cestero declared the citizens of the
Dominican republic “have never
sought the present American inter
vention” and have never ceased to ask
for “restoration of their freedom
and sovereignty.”
“As is well known, for many years,
prior to 1915, the island of Haiti was
the scene of chronic disorders. The
revolutions were sometimes accom
panied by wholesale massacres and
alwys by serious fatalities,,’" says
Mr. Colby’s statement. “The culmi
nation of these conditions came with
the president of President Villbrtln
Guillaume Sam, who was dragged
by a mob from the French legation
where he had taken refuge. This
grave affront to the rights of the
French government resulted in the
landing of French troops in Port Au
Prince. At this time Haii’s Euro
pean creditors were pressing for
payment of the foreign debts and
fear was generally Entertained that
murder of the fiaitian president
would prompt an aggressive program
on the part of some European gov
ernment which would not only chal
lenge the Monroe Doctrine but ar
raign the United States for a failure
io pertorm duties which it had ex
pressly avowed as a part of the Mon
roe Docrine. These duties have no
where found more explicit statement
than in the addresses and messages
How to cite this articleCómo citar este artículo
Pine Bluff daily graphic. (1920). Pine Bluff, Ark., 1920-09-21. US/DR Newspaper Timeline. Library of Congress, Chronicling America: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn89051168/1920-09-21/ed-1/?sp=1
ReferencesReferencias
Library of Congress, Chronicling America: Pine Bluff daily graphic, 1920-09-21.
Send an observationEnviar una observación
Does this article connect with your family, your town, or something you know? Did we get something wrong? Write to us. Observations go to the editor's inbox and are read by a person.¿Este artículo conecta con su familia, su pueblo o algo que usted conoce? ¿Nos equivocamos en algo? Escríbanos. Las observaciones llegan al buzón del editor y las lee una persona.
Send observationEnviar observación