1822–1964 · Library of CongressBiblioteca del Congreso · Chronicling America

Haiti in the American PressHaití en la prensa estadounidense

A companion to the main timeline: the same American newspapers, turned toward Haiti itself — its ports and presidents, its sugar and its storms — in English and Spanish.Una compañera de la cronología principal: los mismos periódicos estadounidenses, vueltos hacia Haití mismo — sus puertos y sus presidentes, su azúcar y sus tormentas — en inglés y en español.
April 6, 18716 de abril de 1871 · Washington, D.C. · 1870sAños 1870

New national era

SourceFuente: New national era · Washington, D.C. · April 6, 18716 de abril de 1871
https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84026753/1871-04-06/ed-1/?sp=2

In contextEn contexto

1870sAños 1870 · 409 articles in this collection from this decade409 artículos de esta colección de esta década
← Earlier articleArtículo anterior: The evening telegraph · April 6, 18716 de abril de 1871Later articleArtículo siguiente: Nashville union and American · April 6, 18716 de abril de 1871 →

More on The Annexation DebateMás sobre El debate de la anexión

From the original pageDe la página original

This page carries the passage as it was found on the newspaper page, copied with its reading errors and all. The article's fuller presentation is still to come; the original page is linked above.Esta página lleva el pasaje tal como se encontró en la página del periódico, copiado con sus errores de lectura y todo. La presentación completa del artículo aún está por venir; la página original está enlazada arriba.

orrespondent of the New York Time*, as

eing waruilv in favor of the annexation of

lanto Domingo. Mr. Douglass hat an unloubted

right to entertain such views a* he

(leases. and also an undoubted right to express

hem whenever and wherever he sees fit. It

nay he true also that the Dominicans are a far

iuperior people {o the Hatien-. and that the

rovemment of Hayti, claiming to be?n repubic,

is a despotism of the most oppressive chaacter.

We have no disposition to underrate

he extent of Mr. Douglass' observations nor

he accuracy of his conclusions. The latter

ire entitled to weight with the country, on ac:ount

of the high character of him who has

bnned them, and the opportunities he has had

arrive at them.

And yet. if Mr. Dongiass is correc tly rejorted.

he goes outside of his legitimate duty

vhen he asserts that "if Mr. Sumner shall

>erse?ere in his present policy, I shall consider

lis opposition factious, and regard him as the

aorst toe the colored race has on this contilent."

There is much of dogmatism in this

issertion, and we have little doubt but that the

'orrespondent has drawn upon his imagination

lur a guou portion 01 it. .>ir. suiuner a oppor

Lanities for collecting correct information hava

aeen ijuite as abundant as those of Mr. Dong

ass. It does not follow that personal inspection

is always the best imaiis of arriving at just

conclusions. The study of abundant doeunents

of an official, ethnological, geographical,

and political character may furnish full as

accurate data, upon which to rely, as a personal

How to cite this articleCómo citar este artículo

New national era. (1871). Washington, D.C., 1871-04-06. Haiti in the American Press. Library of Congress, Chronicling America: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84026753/1871-04-06/ed-1/?sp=2

ReferencesReferencias

Library of Congress, Chronicling America: New national era, 1871-04-06.

Send an observationEnviar una observación

Does this article connect with your family, your town, or something you know? Did we get something wrong? Write to us. Observations go to the editor's inbox and are read by a person.¿Este artículo conecta con su familia, su pueblo o algo que usted conoce? ¿Nos equivocamos en algo? Escríbanos. Las observaciones llegan al buzón del editor y las lee una persona.

Send observationEnviar observación